1) The migration of foreign unaccompanied minors – EUROPE

The struggles of the government when it comes to immigration are well known to everybody, especially with regard to irregular and illegal immigration. What still remains scarcely known is the phenomenon of the so called “foreign unaccompanied minors”.

Who are they? Who and what forces thousands of minors to migrate? Does only poverty and political instability lie behind it or are there also dodgy businesses?

The survey carried out by West, in serial form, aims at shedding light on the problem and finding some answers to these questions. Starting with a historical and legal history in the European context and, in the next episode, in the Italian one. To conclude with the evidences of some insiders .

The phenomenon of the unaccompanied minors began to gain importance in the EU in the 90’s and, since then, this issue acquired more and more relevance.

Foreign Unaccompanied at the expenses of public authorities from 2004 to 2008
Countries Years
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Austria ND ND ND ND ND
Belgium - 2040 1702 1558 1878
Estonia 0 0 0 0 0
Finland 140 220 112 90 706
Francia ND ND ND ND ND
Germany 919 602 612 888 1099
Greece ND ND ND ND ND
Irland 611 661 537 331 344
Italy 8100 7583 6453 7548 7797
Latvia ND ND ND ND ND
Lithuania ND ND ND ND ND
Malta 30 31 57 60 47
Holland 1626 954 633 1182 1858
Poland ND ND ND ND 163
Portugal ND ND ND ND ND
United Kingdom ND ND ND ND ND
Czech Republic 79 116 140 112 100
Slovakia 17 43 46 313 164
Slovenia ND ND ND ND ND
Spain 2004 3160 3064 4497 4916
Sweden 360 378 629 773 1165
Hungary ND ND 36 ND ND

Source: European Migration Network

According to a document circulated by the  European Migration Network – Policies on Reception, Return and Integration arrangements for, and numbers of, Unaccompanied Minors. . An EU comparative study, foreign unaccompanied minors at the expenses of public authorities within the EU space (EU 22) massively increased in number in the last years.

The European Migration Network also mentioned, presenting very different figures, another typology of minors, that of the asylum seeker. In 2008, a total of 11.292 asylum requests submitted by unaccompanied minors in 22 Member States, was recorded. The study also points out that,  if compared to the previous year, there has been an increase of about 3.000 requests.

Requests of asylum on behalf of foreign unaccompanied minors submitted from 2004 to 2008
Countries Years
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Varitions% compared with 2007 Main citizenships
Austria 914 790 414 516 697 3331 35% Afghanistan
Belgium 675 654 491 555 470 2845 -15% Afghanistan, Guinea
Estonia 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -
Finland 140 220 112 90 706 1268 684% Iraq, Somalia, Afghanistan
France 1221 735 571 459 410 3396 -11% Congo, Angola, Russia
Germany 636 331 186 180 763 2096 324% Iraq
Greece ND ND ND 44 296 ND - Pakistan, Afghanistan
Irland 128 131 131 94 98 582 4% Nigeria
Italy ND ND ND ND 573 - - Afghanistan
Latvia 0 3 0 0 4 7 - Afghanistan
Lithuania 11 9 3 5 1 29 -80% Russia
Malta ND 23 58 84 56 - - Somalia
Holland 594 515 410 433 726 2678 68% Somalia, Iraq
Poland 230 278 282 356 376 1522 6% Russia
Portugal ND ND 3 7 6 - - Africa occidentale
United Kingdom 2990 2965 3450 3645 4285 17335 18% Afghanistan
Czech Republic 95 106 92 56 36 385 -36% Turchia
Slovakia 196 101 138 157 72 664 -54% Moldova
Slovenia 104 82 21 27 18 252 -33% Afghanistan
Spain ND ND ND 12 13 - - Marocco, Africa occidentale
Sweden 388 398 820 1264 1510 4380 19% Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia
Hungary 59 41 61 66 176 403 167% Somalia, Pakistan
Total (EU 22) ND ND ND ND 11 292 -

Source: European Migration Network

This data, concerning minors who seek for asylum and those who do not, and their geographic distribution reflect indirectly the two prevailing managing methods in the EU space: the first, typical of the countries of Northern Europe, is characterized by a model of reception within the phenomenon of refugees and asylum seekers.

The second model is offered by Mediterranean countries (Spain, Greece, Italy) and is characterized by an opposite process.

In the mid 70’s, these countries started to witness a change: originally emigration lands they turned into immigration lands. In the mid 80’s they became destination of a growing migration flow mainly coming from Maghreb, Horn of Africa, Albania, Philippines and Latin America. Consequently, Spain, Greece and Italy worked out their immigration and asylum laws, towards the end of the 80’s and the beginning of the 90’s.

These countries faced with a different subject if compared to the one typical of Northern Europe.

Besides the differences existing in the typology of minors (asylum seekers and economic migrants), the European scenario shows some common elements.  The Conference on children’s independent migration, held on October 10-11 2007 in Poitiers, released a document – Migration of Unaccompanied Minors in Europe: Contexts of Origin, Migration Routes and Reception Systems – pointed out several problems among which the risk of involving minors in perverted situations; the search for a job as a main concern; the manifestation, often undervalued, of psychological discomfort; the problems related with the age determination process that affects in turn the path of the minor – reception or expulsion – (some countries, despite the presence of doubts on determining the age, tend to consider the minor as such, conversely, other countries, like the UK, refuse this approach); the lack of professionalism on behalf of the authorities in charge of the minor’s care.


See Also:

2) The migration of Foreign Unaccompanied Minors – ITALY


3) The migration of foreign unaccompanied minors – ALDO MORRONE


4) The migration of foreign unaccompanied minors – GIUSEPPE MAGNO




5) The immigration of foreign unaccompanied minors – FERNANDA CONTRI